|
|
Articles
Introduction With divorce on the rise across the United States, child custody issues are also on the rise. In this firm alone, I have dealt with hundreds of divorces that involve custody disputes. Custody issues must be taken seriously at the trial court level because, while custody appeals are possible, trial court judges are allowed broad discretion to make decisions regarding the custody of children. This means, that on appeal, an appellate court will only reluctantly overturn the initial custody decision. Further, the more time that a child has lived in a certain home situation, the more hesitant the courts will be to remove that child from the seemingly stable situation. For this reason, it is important to seek an experienced family law attorney, accustomed to child custody matters, when facing child custody disputes in divorce proceedings. Legal Standards Applied to Child Custody Issues
At the beginning of the twentieth century, children were usually awarded to their father in the unlikely event that their parents divorced. This was in recognition of the father's "right" to his children's labor and services. Children were considered property. Within the first few decades of the twentieth century, however, the pendulum began to swing the opposite direction and mothers were routinely awarded custody. This was based on the "tender years" doctrine, which professed that children of tender years should be with their mother. Although these absolute rules brought predictability and consistency to divorce proceedings involving children, they often overlooked which parent was better equipped to raise the children and, more importantly, which home situation would provide the optimal situation for the children.
When determining which parent has been the primary caretaker, courts focus on direct care-taking responsibilities, such as: (1) bathing, grooming and dressing; (2) meal planning and preparation; (3) purchasing clothes and laundry responsibilities; (4) health care arrangements; (5) fostering participation in extracurricular activities; (5) teaching of reading, writing, and math skills. Depending on the state, other factors may be considered as important when determining primary caretaker status. Even such things as exposure to second-hand smoke and volunteerism in the child's school have been considered in a primary caretaker analysis. While, in the past, the primary caretaker preference seemed just another way to award custody to mothers, as more and more men share parenting responsibilities, this preference does not necessarily favor mothers. When it is apparent that both parents have equally shared parenting responsibilities, courts once again will fall back on the "best interest" standard in determining custody. Conclusion Child custody disputes are never easy. They are not easy for the courts, for the parents, and they certainly are not easy for the children. Because judges have a large amount of discretion and may be influenced by personal bias or beliefs, it is difficult to predict how a court will rule on custody issues. Therefore, settlement may be the best option for divorcing parents. However, even when considering an out-of-court settlement, parents should have separate legal representation to help ensure that their rights are safeguarded.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||